Tired of reading? Add this page to your Bookmarks or Favorites and finish it later.
|
|
Its spread through England and Scotland, and the seceding bodies
which arose from it, as well as the supposed Jacobite tendency of
certain Scotch lodges, do not concern us here. The point
interesting to us just now is, that Freemasonry was imported to the
Continent exclusively by English and Scotch gentlemen and noblemen.
Lord Derwentwater is said by some to have founded the "Loge
Anglaise" in Paris in 1725; the Duke of Richmond one in his own
castle of Aubigny shortly after. It was through Hanoverian
influence that the movement seems to have spread into Germany. In
1733, for instance, the English Grand Master, Lord Strathmore,
permitted eleven German gentlemen and good brethren to form a lodge
in Hamburg. Into this English Society was Frederick the Great, when
Crown Prince, initiated, in spite of strict old Frederick William's
objections, who had heard of it as an English invention of
irreligious tendency. Francis I. of Austria was made a Freemason at
the Hague, Lord Chesterfield being in the chair, and then became a
Master in London under the name of "Brother Lothringen," to the
discontent of Maria Theresa, whose woman's wit saw farther than her
husband. Englishmen and Scotchmen introduced the new society into
Russia and into Geneva. Sweden and Poland seem to have received it
from France; while, in the South, it seems to have been exclusively
an English plant. Sackville, Duke of Middlesex, is said to have
founded the first lodge at Florence in 1733, Lord Coleraine at
Gibraltar and Madrid, one Gordon in Portugal; and everywhere, at the
commencement of the movement, we find either London or Scotland the
mother-lodges, introducing on the Continent those liberal and humane
ideas of which England was then considered, to her glory, as the
only home left on earth.
But, alas! the seed sown grew up into strange shapes, according to
the soil in which it rooted. False doctrine, heresy, and schism,
according to Herr Findel, the learned and rational historian whom I
have chiefly followed, defiled the new Church from its infancy. "In
France," so he bemoans himself, "first of all there shot up that
baneful seed of lies and frauds, of vanity and presumption, of
hatred and discord, the mischievous high degrees; the misstatement
that our order was allied to the Templars, and existed at the time
of the Crusades; the removal of old charges, the bringing in
surreptitiously of a multitude of symbols and forms which awoke the
love of secrecy; knighthood; and, in fact, all which tended to
poison Freemasonry." Herr Findel seems to attribute these evils
principally to the "high degrees." It would have been more simple
to have attributed them to the morals of the French noblesse in the
days of Louis Quinze. What could a corrupt tree bring forth, but
corrupt fruit? If some of the early lodges, like those of "La
Felicite" and "L'Ancre," to which women were admitted, resembled not
a little the Bacchic mysteries of old Rome, and like them called for
the interference of the police, still no great reform was to be
expected, when those Sovereign Masonic Princes, the "Emperors of the
East and West," quarrelled--knights of the East against knights of
the West--till they were absorbed or crushed by the Lodge "Grand
Orient," with Philippe Egalite, Duc de Chartres, as their grand
master, and as his representative, the hero of the diamond necklace,
and disciple of Count Cagliostro--Louis, Prince de Rohan.
|